High over Kent, a pair of Spitfires are directed onto a pair
of 109s on a Frei Jagd. Both pairs consist of an Experienced pilot with a
Rookie wingman, and are closing at the same altitude, head on. “Tally Ho!”
Initially both sides grab altitude but neither gain an advantage.
Then as the range drops the Spitfire
leader decides to try and outmanoeuvre his opponent, and succeeds in dropping
the lead 109s status to neutral. The Brit’s wingman has a chance to shoot at the
lead 109 but declines as this would result in a straight exchange of fire and
instead moves to get a better position.
The lead 109 tries scissors on to the
lead Spitfire but the British pilot counters and remains in the advantaged
position. The second 109 tries to cover the tail of his now vulnerable flight
leader, but doesn’t quite manage to get into position. The lead Brit seizes the
chance and burns his advantage to brake hard and drops in behind the lead 109
in a tailing position, immediately reducing the German to a disadvantaged
position. Eight .303 Browning’s spit fire but no hits are caused. Both 109s desperately
twist and turn, and the Spitfires try and stay with them. This continues for
several long seconds with neither side gaining a significant advantage or
viable shooting chance. Then a burst of MG fire comes close to the second 109,
only a deft flick roll saves him, but in doing so he becomes detached from his
leader, who is again disadvantaged, and now out on his own.
Lead Spitfire lines him up, and this
time rakes the 109 from tail to cockpit, and the Messerschmitt suddenly rolls
into a vertical dive, never to recover.
The surprising thing is that pretty much sums up the game we
just had using the basic Blood Red Skies rules. What really impressed me was
the sheer narrative energy the rules generate. It really did feel as though
every decision counted and that fight to gain advantage. Freed from all the charts and order writing we got to play a fast and quite exciting game - which is just what air combat should be.
Couple of caveats – we were only playing the basic rules and
we only had a pair of planes each as we wanted to start small. This is partly
so we can get a better grasp and partly because we could only scrape together a
few planes at short notice (and yes the 109s are not Emils but it was all we had at the time) The planes in the pics are 1:144 scale and on magnetic
gimbal mounts, which are rather a nice idea we pinched from playing Wings Of
War and are pretty good for marking advantage status in the same way as the "official" bases.
Tally Ho! |
Grab for altitude |
Closing pass |
Throwing the kites around |
Killing shot |
I’m going to avoid the hyperbole and just say I was rather
impressed at both the fluidity and the execution of BRS. There’s a very good feel
to the game unlike anything I’ve played on a tabletop for WW2 dogfighting. The
way each action can change the all-important advantage status is really something
– make a mistake and let the opposition get behind you and you better have
either a competent wingman or a lot of luck.
I'm not sure how it will play with six planes or more a side, but I don't think there is anything in there that will inherently change the game plays - which is, as I say, quite good so far. I think Andy Chambers deserves a pat on the back and if Warlord manage to deliver this without too much faffing and don't bloat it, it could be setting the standard for some time to come.
We did have a couple of questions about the rules, but its early days and I'm sure some clarifications will follow.
So Tally Ho!
Thanks to Paul Davison acting as opponent \ Guinea Pig. I happen to know a certain Geordie is painting up some ore planes so between us we can try a six v six "soon"
Thanks to Paul Davison acting as opponent \ Guinea Pig. I happen to know a certain Geordie is painting up some ore planes so between us we can try a six v six "soon"
Good write up. I feel the excitement stirring, especially after viewing Dunkirk. I think I will dig out Battle of Britain and watch it tonight. Tally-ho!
ReplyDeleteI did like yourself, download the free rules, grab some models and have at it.
ReplyDeleteYes it played quickly with 2 on 2, with victory going to the first lot to establish a decent firing position.
Nice, but a bit instant.
Tried again 6 vs 6, MUCH slower and chaotic, with a definite "Nail the enemy rookie" incentive.
Finished with the sort of gaming headache I used to associate with WRG ancients rules.
I wonder whether the extras in the full-fat game modify this much.
I like the concepts.
6 vs 6 seems chaotic (probably eminently suitable for WW1 dogfights).
Cannot understand why the kickstarter bundles feature such huge numbers of aircraft as 12v12 or 24v24 seems utterly unmanageable.
On the bundle sizes I share your puzzlement. Looking at the stats I would expect a standard game to be 4-6 planes a side \ player. I can handle that, but any more and I think I'm going to struggle. I think there is a fundamental disconnect in those starter bundles. Six planes is a good package point given elements will be either Vics of 3 or Pairs of 2, but the "Marketing Suits" seem to not grasp the nature of the game as far as those bundles go. Still, only a month to go so we will see
DeleteI agree, without having actually tested the game, I can't see more than 6 or so planes on the table per side. Comparing with X-wing (which probably plays totally different but sort of sits in the same category of game) it really bogs down when you have more than 5-6 ships per side. It can still be fun, but it's tedious and you sort of either make the same maneuver with all the ships all the time or just constantly botch the moves of a couple of ships each turn, just because your brain can't cope with all the possibilites same time.
DeleteIt would probably have been better to do alternative aircraft types from the get go and bundle those.